Unlike the stand-off between the US and Soviet Union which emerged during the Cold War, contemporary powers today seem to be playing by different rules. This report looks at how the thinking on strategic deterrence has changed over the past two decades and considers that a failure to learn from the Cold War experience could lead to a new round of modernisation and missile defence proliferation.

STRATEGIC deterrence was a military concept which, 35 years ago, was commonly understood as a means to prevent nuclear conflict between the Soviet Bloc and the United States and its allies.

During the Cold War (1945–1991) the strategy was ...

Unlock the report
8.95 EUR
Secure, instant payment by credit card
Dr. James Jay Carafano
The fragility of strategic deterrence during the Cold War and the questionable orthodoxy of the ‘rules’ for managing nuclear arsenals is largely absent from contemporary thinking on strategic defence
read more about it in the report
Who will benefit?
  • Report is targeted to the decision makers in cross country manufacturing – suppliers, manufacturers, logistics.
  • Also considered useful for the administrative university facilities, to better understand the possible effects of current decisions.
By clicking "I Agree" below, you acknowledge that you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions. Feel free to check out our policies anytime for more information.
I agree