Fukushima facts demand a complete review of nuclear safety

Fukushima on March 18, 2011, was an accident that could have been avoided (photo: dpa)
Fukushima on March 18, 2011, was an accident that could have been avoided (photo: dpa)

A cold shutdown, requiring a stable electricity supply and heat sinks, saved two of Fukushima’s six nuclear reactors after the earthquake and tsunami. But three of the others suffered meltdown and explosion. Basing safety measures on probability was shown to be the wrong policy – because even the most unlikely events can happen, with disastrous consequences explains Professor Dr Stefan Lippert in the third part of our five-part-series on Fukushima.

THE JAPANESE government and the country’s ‘nuclear village’ continue to claim that the magnitude of the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami was a natural disaster far beyond anything anyone could have imagined or planned for.

...

Not a subscriber yet?

Subscribe now and get the latest in-depth geopolitical analysis and forecasts from GIS’s unrivaled cadre of experts.

Learn more about our subscription plans.

You can also buy this report for €8.99 Buy

Add your comment