Davos, Switzerland, Jan. 21, 2016: Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko after Ukraine refused to repay its debt to Russia (source: dpa)

IMF puts itself in a fix as it bends rules to bail out Ukraine

On December 18, 2015, the government of Ukraine announced it had no intention of honoring a $3 billion Eurobond loan owed to Russia that would mature on December 20. Given the cross-default clause written into that bond, under British law, this was a momentous decision. It gave the Kremlin the right to have Ukraine declared in sovereign default, which would have precluded further financing from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This, in turn, would have led to state failure.

At least that is what would have happened, if long-accepted rules had still applied. But that is no longer the case. Just as the Kremlin has demonstrated it can ignore treaties regarding national sovereignty ...

Unlock the report
8.95 EUR
Secure, instant payment by credit card
Professor Stefan Hedlund
Casting the IMF in the role of Ukraine’s ultimate protector not only lends credence to Russian conspiracy theories of the IMF as an extended arm of United States foreign policy. It also undermines the integrity of the IMF in its relations with other countries in financial distress
read more about it in the report
Who will benefit?
  • Report is targeted to the decision makers in cross country manufacturing – suppliers, manufacturers, logistics.
  • Also considered useful for the administrative university facilities, to better understand the possible effects of current decisions.
By clicking "I Agree" below, you acknowledge that you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions. Feel free to check out our policies anytime for more information.
I agree